![]()
电影的发行，例如“ 7月31日”，“ Nanjing Photo Studio”和“ Dongji Island”，这为我们提供了另一种方法，使我们恢复了战争的记忆并揭示了有关日本军国主义的真相。然而，在日本文化中，这些图像反映了日本社会战争战争的模棱两可和分歧，这使得诸如改善军事主义并涵盖战争表面的责任等问题。 9月20日下午，Sinan文学之家始于深入的对话，致力于现代日本战争的历史。 Focusing on the theme of "Anti-Japanese memory in the image: Why Japan started the 'Rampage' Road of Militaryism", Sha Qingqing, author of "Rampage of Military and Country: Memory of War in Modern Japan", there was a conversation with Shahang Zhaoqi, Associate Professor of the History Department of Fudan University andAuthor of "The Empire of" No Responsibility ": The Expansion and Destruction of Modern Japan of" The Empire of "No责任ty": (1895-1945). From development to control; In the next decades a conversation of "transferring the internal crisis through foreign wars" has been repeatedly featured in the Russo-Japanese war and the war of aggression against China, which forms a dangerous inertia in history Qingqing taught that the Constitution of Meiji in 1890 set out "the emperor or the army and the army" and the number of standing troops, but the emperor really没有命令陆军斗争；军方继续失败，美国军方直接指向冲绳，即将ACK日本大陆。日本的政府和军事都知道战争是不稳定的。在谈论1945年的日本投降时，两位学者都强调了“被动”和“慢弱”：尽管美军在日本抛弃了一枚原子炸弹，但统治的日本组织因“拒绝承担投降负责”而一再推迟，直到皇帝释放了一场战争。 Sha Qingqing指出：“一些日本学者还认为，屈服的提交为时已晚，造成了更多的灾难。” Shang Zhaoqi相信日本当时对“国家理论”的信念也并没有直接导致这一结果。所谓的“国家理论”是指统治国家的皇帝的形式。最重要的论点是，皇帝是国家的“老师”和人民“神的存在。对现代日本军国主义的“激进”历史的努力不仅是恢复历史现实，而且还要警惕诸如“通过战争转移冲突”和“逃避责任”之类的危险逻辑。回到Sohu看看更多
